Dr. Vladimir Panine of Chicago, Illinois is Recommended on the Hair Transplant Network
The experience and skill of hair transplant surgeons vary, as do their results. That’s why only surgeons with a proven record of producing quality results are recommended on the Hair Transplant Network.
Dr. Vladimir Panine of Chicago Illinois, his technique, and results were carefully reviewed over the last year by our hair loss forum community in consideration for recommendation. We are pleased to announce that Dr. Panine has been approved for recommendation by our online community. To learn how we recommend hair transplant surgeons, click here.
Dr. Panine has over 15 years of experience performing surgical hair restoration as the primary part of his practice. He has the staff and experience to perform large sessions of quality follicular unit hair transplant surgery exceeding 3000 grafts when appropriate for the patient.
After thorough evaluation and seeking input from the patient and physician members of this community, we believe Dr. Panine deserves to be recommended on the Hair Transplant Network.
Dr. Panine is now recommended on the Hair Transplant Network. To congratulate and welcome him to our community, visit the “Potential Recommendation of Dr. Vladimir Panine of Chicago, Illinois“.
Those local to Chicago, Illinois and beyond considering surgical hair restoration should definitely consult with Dr. Panine and consider him for surgery. To view his physician profile and learn how to contact him, click here.
Bill Seemiller
Associate Publisher/Editor
Technorati Tags: hair transplant, Dr. Panine, hair restoration
January 17, 2017 @ 9:32 pm
I am truing to find a personal injury attorney to file a suit against Dr. Vladimir Panine for the unsuccessful hair transplant surgery (2 sessions) involving both scaring and negligence of the surgeon. Accepting a patient for large FUE procedure in the clinic thatâ??s specialized for another type of hair transplant procedure (FUT) is a huge negligence. I have spent 14 hours on the operating table during the first procedure and thatâ??s unacceptable!
The second and most important claim is that during the second procedure FUE harvesting was performed by two of his young assistants (without a license to practice medicine) while Dr. Panine was in his office during the whole graft harvesting procedure. That is capital negligence since that’s the crucial step in the FUE procedure. The outcome as You can imagine is really bad and it left me with both physical and emotional scars.