Within the last several months, injectable, cell-based hair loss treatments seem to be the most discussed topic in medical hair restoration. Whether it’s a hair stimulating complex, stem cell based therapy, or even clandestine, miracle “compounds,” injectable hair loss therapies are being hailed as baldness cures by patients, rushed to clinical trials by biomedical corporations, and cautiously analyzed by practitioners and dedicated researchers.

Although excellent, detailed analysis has been written on the subject, hair loss sufferers still yearn for two crucial details: 1. Will these products work, and 2. When will they be available for use?

Unfortunately, we simple do not know (yet).

The efficacy of these products is something every individual involved with the field of hair restoration eagerly awaits. Although it’s difficult to generalize, many of these therapies have fallen prey to common research fallacies, such as initial promising data that does not continue during later phases, funding issues, a lack of adherence to scientific research techniques, and conducting insufficient rounds of clinical trials. However, several products have continued demonstrating noticeable results and are conducting advanced research trials as we speak. This type of progress will demonstrate the true initial efficacy (maintenance over a long period of time could become another issue) of these therapies, but unfortunately is not available yet. Additionally, until these products are proven safe and effective, they probably will not be available for commercial usage.

However, knowing that these therapies “could” work and “could” be available within a manageable period does not change the fact that there are certain tools and therapies hair loss patients can utilize today. Preventive medications such as Rogaine (minoxidil) and Propecia (finasteride) are proven, effective, and readily available. Furthermore, these medications would (conceivable) have no effect on the usage of hypothetical, future treatments, meaning they should be investigated now! Also, hair transplant surgery is also an option for appropriate candidates and will not interfere with future techniques. Ideally, one should utilize these proven treatments now and remain cautiously optimistic to future techniques, therapies, and potential cures.

_______________
Blake Bloxham – formerly “Future_HT_Doc”

Editorial Assistant and Forum Co-Moderator for the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog, and the Hair Restoration Forum

Follow our community on Twitter

Watch hair transplant videos on YouTube

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , Rogaine, , Propecia, , hair transplant surgery

Bill - Seemiller

Recent Posts

Body Hair Transplants Are They Worth It? Dr. Pradeep Sethi Answers

I'm at thirty-one year old man with a Norwood 6 level of hair loss. I…

3 years ago

Can I Get an FUE Without Propecia?

I'm a 31 year old male I have been losing hair for the past six…

3 years ago

Am I Balding? How To Tell The Signs of Hair Loss

I'm concerned that i'm going bald. My dad is 54 years old, and still has…

3 years ago

Should I Choose an FUE or FUT Hair Transplant?

I'm a 30-year old male with a Norwood 4 hair loss pattern. I have been…

3 years ago

Should I Get A Hair Transplant or Hair System?

I'm twenty years old and already have aggressive hair loss. I'm imbetween a Norwood 5…

3 years ago

What Is The Success Rate of Hair Transplants?

I'm interested in getting a hair transplant later this year, but I am a very…

3 years ago